<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Madonna	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://totallyhistory.com/madonna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://totallyhistory.com/madonna/</link>
	<description>Facts About Famous Events &#38; Records of the Past</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 05:15:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Homer Simpson		</title>
		<link>https://totallyhistory.com/madonna/#comment-705269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Homer Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 05:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totallyhistory.com/?p=45410#comment-705269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Please rethink your rationale behind censoring this magnificent painting. The inclusion of those two squares is an attempt to lower Edvard Munch&#039;s expression to nothing more than common pornography.

Even if it isn&#039;t your intent, censoring the female form in this work of art, vandalizes the passion, love and beauty this masterpiece radiates.  The fact your website is partially dedicated to art history elevates this prudish folly to nothing short of tragedy. Not to mention it is just plain silly to consider breasts lewd, especially in the context of artistic expression.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please rethink your rationale behind censoring this magnificent painting. The inclusion of those two squares is an attempt to lower Edvard Munch&#8217;s expression to nothing more than common pornography.</p>
<p>Even if it isn&#8217;t your intent, censoring the female form in this work of art, vandalizes the passion, love and beauty this masterpiece radiates.  The fact your website is partially dedicated to art history elevates this prudish folly to nothing short of tragedy. Not to mention it is just plain silly to consider breasts lewd, especially in the context of artistic expression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Darshana Bhattacharya		</title>
		<link>https://totallyhistory.com/madonna/#comment-671643</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darshana Bhattacharya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totallyhistory.com/?p=45410#comment-671643</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Firstly I know that she is meant to be Mother Mary as She is above all worldly ties . Secondly this nonsensical notion seems not only unacceptable and a bit too much but also a big , ridiculous joke .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly I know that she is meant to be Mother Mary as She is above all worldly ties . Secondly this nonsensical notion seems not only unacceptable and a bit too much but also a big , ridiculous joke .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
